NomaNoma

GeminiAI search visibility

See how your brand shows up in Gemini

Gemini reaches for live web content before it answers, so the sources it trusts decide what it says about you. Noma tracks both: the answer, and what shaped it.

Polled daily across
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexity

What Noma tracks in Gemini

Abstract illustration: a row of tiles with one missing

[ mention frequency ]

Mention frequency

How often Gemini names your brand across your tracked prompts, polled daily from fresh sessions.

Abstract illustration: identical glass bars stacked evenly

[ share of voice ]

Share of voice

Your share of brand mentions against every competitor appearing in the same answers.

Abstract illustration: a pale sphere with fine lines converging on it

[ grounding sources ]

Grounding sources

Gemini checks live pages before answering. Noma records which ones it drew on, so you can see whether your content is in that pool at all.

Abstract illustration: layered translucent panels

[ sentiment ]

Sentiment

Whether the answers naming you read positively, neutrally or negatively, scored consistently over time.

Abstract illustration: blank sheets stacked slightly askew

[ competitor set ]

Competitor set

Gemini favours a different set of brands than ChatGPT. Tracking them together is the only way to see it.

Abstract illustration: a tinted glass sheet over two smaller sheets

[ hallucinated claims ]

Hallucinated claims

Untrue statements about your brand, captured with the prompt and model that produced them.

More than a monitoring tool

Measuring is the easy half. These are the three places the number actually moves.

WORKSPACE

Find the publishers and forums already shaping Gemini's answers in your category, so you know where a mention actually changes the result.

Because Gemini grounds answers in live pages rather than memory alone, the fastest way to change what it says is to change what it can find. Start from the sources Noma shows it already reads for your topic rather than applying one strategy across every engine.

Monitoring visibility in Gemini

Gemini leans harder on live retrieval, so its answers move as the web moves and its citation list is often more current. Your standing in Gemini can look nothing like your standing in ChatGPT, which is the reason to measure them separately rather than averaging.

No. There is no numbered results list. Visibility is how often your brand is named across answers, how it is framed against competitors, and which sources were cited to reach it. Noma turns that into a trackable score rather than a position.

Yes. Noma polls ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity daily from the same prompt set, so you can compare them directly. Being strong on four and invisible on one is a different problem from being weak everywhere, and an average hides it.

No. Noma reads only your public site, the same way an engine does. There is nothing to connect and no access to grant.

The visibility score takes about fifteen seconds. The full 12-point technical and content audit runs in under two minutes.

Work on the sources Noma shows are already grounding its answers for your category. Because retrieval happens at answer time, a new mention in a source it reads can change the answer far faster than a change to your own site.

[ get started ]

Find out what Gemini says about your brand

A free audit of your public site, scored across all five engines. No account and no card, and it runs on any domain.